Female Representation in Retracted Scientific Publications: A Study of Authorship and Collaboration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5530/jcitation.20250143Keywords:
Female Authorship, Gender Disparity, Male-Female Collaboration, RetractionAbstract
Numerous studies in the literature have emphasized the underrepresentation of women in the scientific field, leading to their underrepresentation in prestigious publications, authorship roles, and collaborations. At the same time, the involvement of women in scientific misconduct is also increasingly attracting the attention of the scientific community. This motivated the present study to explore female collaboration and authorship positions in retracted publications. To conduct the analysis, 3750 retracted scientific papers were extracted from the Web of Science, and the respective gender of each author was identified. The evaluation included the year-wise representation of female authors, females at various authorship positions, collaboration, and female-to-male odds ratio. In all, 26.43% of authorship is held by women, and the share of male-female collaborative retracted publications is 55.11%. To conclude, women are less likely to hold the last authorship and more likely to hold the middle authorship position in retracted publications

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kiran Sharma, Satyam Mukherjee, Harsha V. Garine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.